Mandatory Second Opinion in CytopathologyLUECK, Nathan; JENSEN, Chris; COHEN, Michael B et al.Cancer. 2009, Vol 117, Num 2, pp 82-91, issn 0008-543X, 10 p.Article

Second opinions and tertiary referrals in neurology : A prospective observational studyWIESKE, L; WIJERS, D; RICHARD, E et al.Journal of neurology. 2008, Vol 255, Num 11, pp 1743-1749, issn 0340-5354, 7 p.Article

Interinstitutional pathology consultations: A reassessmentWEIR, Michele M; JAN, E; COLGAN, Terence J et al.American journal of clinical pathology. 2003, Vol 120, Num 3, pp 405-412, issn 0002-9173, 8 p.Article

Mandatory Second Opinion in Surgical Pathology Referral Material : Clinical Consequences of Major DisagreementsMANION, Elizabeth; COHEN, Michael B; WEYDERT, Jamie et al.The American journal of surgical pathology. 2008, Vol 32, Num 5, pp 732-737, issn 0147-5185, 6 p.Article

Institutional Pathology consultationTSUNG, Jeffrey S. H.The American journal of surgical pathology. 2004, Vol 28, Num 3, pp 399-402, issn 0147-5185, 4 p.Article

Diagnostic accuracy of second-opinion diagnoses based on still imagesNORDRUM, Ivar; JOHANSEN, Monika; AMIN, Anil et al.Human pathology. 2004, Vol 35, Num 1, pp 129-135, issn 0046-8177, 7 p.Article

Institutional review of outside cytology materials: A retrospective analysis of two institutions' experiencesLAYFIELD, Lester J; JONES, Claudia; ROWE, Leslie et al.Diagnostic cytopathology. 2002, Vol 26, Num 1, pp 45-48, issn 8755-1039Article

Unabhängige zahnärztliche Patientenberatung : Erfahrungen aus der Beratungsstelle für den Rhein-Neckar-Kreis = The pressing need for advice : Independent dental patient advisory service for the Rhine-Neckar districtNIEKUSCH, U; WAGNER, C; KLETT, M et al.Das Gesundheitswesen (Stuttgart. Thieme). 2006, Vol 68, Num 1, pp 18-25, issn 0941-3790, 8 p.Article

Patient satisfaction in neurological second opinions and tertiary referralsWIJERS, D; WIESKE, L; VERGOUWEN, M. D. I et al.Journal of neurology. 2010, Vol 257, Num 11, pp 1869-1874, issn 0340-5354, 6 p.Article

The value of second opinion in gastrointestinal and liver pathologyHAHM, Geoffrey K; NIEMANN, Theodore H; LUCAS et al.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976). 2001, Vol 125, Num 6, pp 736-739, issn 0363-0153Article

Reassessing accuracy rates of median decisionsCAPOTORTI, Andrea; LAD, Frank; SANFILIPPO, Giuseppe et al.The American statistician. 2007, Vol 61, Num 2, pp 132-138, issn 0003-1305, 7 p.Article

Second Opinions Improve ADHD Prescribing in a Medicaid-Insured Community PopulationTHOMPSON, Jeffery N; VARLEY, Christopher K; MCCLELLAN, Jon et al.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2009, Vol 48, Num 7, pp 740-748, issn 0890-8567, 9 p.Article

Sonographische Abklärung eines Adnexbefundes : Tumoren des weiblichen Beckens = Ultrasonographic clarification of adnexal findings : Tumors of the female pelvisPRÖMPELER, H. J.Der Radiologe (Berlin. Print). 2011, Vol 51, Num 7, pp 568-580, issn 0033-832X, 13 p.Article

Guidelines for telematic second opinion consultation on headaches in Europe: on behalf of the European Headache Federation (EHF)PEREIRA-MONTEIRO, José; WYSOCKA-BAKOWSKA, Maria-Magdalena; KATSARAVA, Zaza et al.The Journal of headache and pain (Testo stampato). 2010, Vol 11, Num 4, pp 345-348, issn 1129-2369, 4 p.Article

Measuring the value of review of pathology material by a second pathologistRENSHAW, Andrew A; GOULD, Edwin W.American journal of clinical pathology. 2006, Vol 125, Num 5, pp 737-739, issn 0002-9173, 3 p.Article

Referrals for second opinion in surgical pathology: implications for management of cancer patients in the UKCOOK, I. S; MCCORMICK, D; POLLER, D. N et al.European journal of surgical oncology. 2001, Vol 27, Num 6, pp 589-594, issn 0748-7983Article

Second Opinion Interpretations by Specialty Radiologists at a Pediatric Hospital: Rate of Disagreement and Clinical ImplicationsEAKINS, Christopher; ELLIS, Wendy D; PRUTHI, Sumit et al.American journal of roentgenology (1976). 2012, Vol 199, Num 4, pp 916-920, issn 0361-803X, 5 p.Article

Agreement and error rates using blinded review to evaluate surgical pathology of biopsy materialRENSHAW, Andrew A; CARTAGENA, Norberto; GRANTER, Scott R et al.American journal of clinical pathology. 2003, Vol 119, Num 6, pp 797-800, issn 0002-9173, 4 p.Article

Expert second-opinion pathology review of lymphoma in the era of the World Health Organization classificationMATASAR, M. J; SHI, W; SILBERSTIEN, J et al.Annals of oncology. 2012, Vol 23, Num 1, pp 159-166, issn 0923-7534, 8 p.Article

Patient―physician relationships in second opinion encounters — The physicians' perspectiveGREENFIELD, Geva; PLISKIN, Joseph S; FEDER-BUBIS, Paula et al.Social science & medicine (1982). 2012, Vol 75, Num 7, pp 1202-1212, issn 0277-9536, 11 p.Article

Burden or Relief: Do Second-Opinion Centers Influence the Quality of Care Delivered to Patients with Testicular Germ Cell Cancer?SCHRADER, Mark; WEISSBACH, Lothar; HARTMANN, Michael et al.European urology. 2010, Vol 57, Num 5, pp 867-872, issn 0302-2838, 6 p.Article

Comparison of disagreement and error rates for three types of interdepartmental consultationsRENSHAW, Andrew A; GOULD, Edwin W.American journal of clinical pathology. 2005, Vol 124, Num 6, pp 878-882, issn 0002-9173, 5 p.Article

Slide review in gynecologic oncology ensures completeness of reporting and diagnostic accuracyKHALIFA, Mahmoud A; DODGE, Jason; COVENS, Allan et al.Gynecologic oncology (Print). 2003, Vol 90, Num 2, pp 425-430, issn 0090-8258, 6 p.Article

Do First Opinions Affect Second Opinions?VASHITZ, Geva; PLISKIN, Joseph S; PARMET, Yisrael et al.Journal of general internal medicine. 2012, Vol 27, Num 10, pp 1265-1271, issn 0884-8734, 7 p.Article

Should Pathologists Send All or Only Selected Slides for Patient-Requested Interlaboratory Second Opinion?RENSHAW, Megan A; RENSHAW, Andrew A; GOULD, Edwin W et al.American journal of clinical pathology. 2009, Vol 132, Num 5, pp 763-766, issn 0002-9173, 4 p.Article